grammar - Omission of 'for' with various quantified time intervals: influence of verb


I came across these two examples, given to illustrate 'a case' where the inclusion of the preposition for is considered optional in the paper "Acquisition of Preposition Deletion by Non-native Speakers of English" by the authors Jae-Min Kim and Gil-Soon Ahn (in §2, on p.3):



a. We have lived here (for) 12 years.


b. I've studied English (for) ten years.



Though I have no problems with either version of the (a) sentence, omitting the preposition in (b) sounds unacceptable to me.


Is this regional?


Is acceptability influenced by



  1. the size of the DO (/locative / PP / ...) between the verb and the time phrase

  2. the actual verb used


?


Please note: The referenced paper is very useful, but contains a few expressions that need minor corrections – possibly translation errors.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

etymology - Origin of "s--t eating grin"

usage - "there doesn't seem" vs. "there don't seem"

First floor vs ground floor, usage origin

pronunciation - Where does the intrusive R come from in “warsh”?

Abbreviation of "Street"

etymology - Since when has "a hot minute" meant a long time?

meaning - What is synonyme of "scale"?