grammar - Omission of 'for' with various quantified time intervals: influence of verb


I came across these two examples, given to illustrate 'a case' where the inclusion of the preposition for is considered optional in the paper "Acquisition of Preposition Deletion by Non-native Speakers of English" by the authors Jae-Min Kim and Gil-Soon Ahn (in §2, on p.3):



a. We have lived here (for) 12 years.


b. I've studied English (for) ten years.



Though I have no problems with either version of the (a) sentence, omitting the preposition in (b) sounds unacceptable to me.


Is this regional?


Is acceptability influenced by



  1. the size of the DO (/locative / PP / ...) between the verb and the time phrase

  2. the actual verb used


?


Please note: The referenced paper is very useful, but contains a few expressions that need minor corrections – possibly translation errors.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

commas - Does this sentence have too many subjunctives?

verbs - "Baby is creeping" vs. "baby is crawling" in AmE

time - English notation for hour, minutes and seconds

etymology - Origin of "s--t eating grin"

grammatical number - Use of lone apostrophe for plural?

etymology - Where does the phrase "doctored" originate?

single word requests - What do you call hypothetical inhabitants living on the Moon?