grammar - What is the difference between "He seemed to be angry." and "He seemed angry."?


I want to know the difference between the following sentences:



  1. He seemed to be angry.

  2. He seemed angry.


I heard that when I use "to be" in the text like in above sentence, "to be" means "subjective". When without "to be" means objective.


When somebody says "She seemed to be beautiful", It means she is beautiful to someone." When somebody says "She seemed beautiful?, It means that everybody thinks she is beautiful. Is that right?




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

etymology - Origin of "s--t eating grin"

etymology - Since when has "a hot minute" meant a long time?

etymology - Why "silver-tongued" for someone who is convincing?

usage - "there doesn't seem" vs. "there don't seem"

etymology - Origin of "queer as a clockwork orange"

First floor vs ground floor, usage origin

meaning - What is meant by "don't piss on my boots and tell me it's raining"?