grammar - Must a coordinating clause always have a subject?


E.g.,



(1) You are getting yourselves into a very dangerous situation; get out of there at once.



The imperative following the first clause has an implied subject, so would this mean it is a coordinating clause? If the above sentence was coordinated with so, would that change the status of the clause?



(2) You should wear a suit, a clean shirt and a tie for the interview, and be punctual.



Is and be punctual a coordinating clause?



(3) Worcester is a very sought after porcelain, and is regarded as the finest of the period by many experts.



The following clause of this sentence contains a passive structure with an implied subject, so does this make it a full coordinating clause? How would the status of the sentence change if by many experts were omitted?




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

etymology - Origin of "s--t eating grin"

First floor vs ground floor, usage origin

usage - "there doesn't seem" vs. "there don't seem"

pronunciation - Where does the intrusive R come from in “warsh”?

Abbreviation of "Street"

etymology - Since when has "a hot minute" meant a long time?

meaning - What is synonyme of "scale"?