ambiguity - "May not" -- no choice vs. mere restriction


This is from the tabletop game Warhammer 40k rulebook:


The turn Marines arrive they may not assault.


I always assumed it means they are not allowed to assault. But the meaning "they may choose not to assault" (as opposed to "they must always assault") would be perfectly legitimate too, as far as game rules go.


So how do you tell whether it limits your choices (not allowed to) or extends them (allowed not to)? How it should be worded if the meaning was "allowed not to"?



Answer



'may not' is only slightly ambiguous in general ("is not allowed" is preferred to "can choose not to"). In this context though, it definitely takes on the "is not allowed" meaning because the negative, "they may assault" was not used.


That is, though the literal meaning is ambiguous, the implication (because of not using the negation) forces the interpretation to be "is not allowed".


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

etymology - Origin of "s--t eating grin"

usage - "there doesn't seem" vs. "there don't seem"

Abbreviation of "Street"

meaning - What is synonyme of "scale"?

First floor vs ground floor, usage origin

etymology - Since when has "a hot minute" meant a long time?

meaning - "Instable" or "unstable"?