acronyms - Why isn't USA an attributive adjective, (but US is)?


When referring to the country, both US and USA (among other forms), are acceptable. But when used as an adjective, USA sounds wrong.



Even in the expanded form (for emphasis), I hear sentences like:



He's a United States Senator, he has a lot of influence. (never United States of America Senator.)



Wikipedia lists the adjectives as American and US.


Is USA an adjective? Was it ever?


If not, how did US originate to be the adjectival form and why was USA dropped?


EDIT: After Janus's comment below, I wonder if US can be used predicatively (or is it used solely attributively)?


For instance, can we say "The car is US" instead of "The car is American"?



Answer



TL;DR


US and USA are not adjectives: they are nouns that can potentially be used attributively, with the same meaning as the corresponding adjectives (if such exist). Headlinese has slightly different rules, but in normal, non-Headlinese language use:




  • USA is not used attributively because it is an abbreviation of a compound country name (United States of America), and these cannot be used attributively. The corresponding adjective is American.




  • US is used attributively because it is an abbreviation of a simple, non-compound country name (United States), and these (rare though they are) can be used attributively. There is no corresponding adjective.






Country names: noun adjuncts and true adjectives


Generally speaking, most country names in English can be used adjectivally, as noun adjuncts; that is, they can be used with the force of an adjective (meaning ‘of Country’ or ‘from Country’) to modify a noun (“the X noun”). Like all nouns, however, they cannot be used as predicative adjectives (as in “the noun is X”):



[noun] The Zimbabwe economy / *He is Zimbabwe



(Compare attributive “a golf shoe”, but predicative “*the shoe is golf”.)


A lot of country names have corresponding true adjectives that are used instead of the country name when adjectival use is required. These can be used both attributively and predicatively:



[adjective] The Zimbabwean economy / He is Zimbabwean



In most cases, blocking prevents both the adjective and the noun from being in common use at the same time for (attributive) adjectival use: if there is a true adjective, that is normally preferred over the country name. The exception is in Headlinese, where whichever form is shorter is often used. Even in Headlinese, however, noun forms are never used predicatively:



[language use] Attributive / Predicative
[normal] A Canadian city / He is Canadian (adjective)
[normal] *A Canada city / *He is Canada (noun)


[Headlinese] Canadian MP to stand down / The MP is Canadian (adjective)
[Headlinese] Canada MP to stand down / *The MP is Canada (noun)




Country names: simple and compound


This all applies to what I shall—for lack of a better term—call simple country names, that is, names that consist only of one or more constituents that denote territories in some way. (Constituents being here more or less equivalent to noun phrases—so [South Africa] is one constituent, but [São Tomé] and [Príncipe] is two, combined with the coordinator ‘and’.)


Simple country names contrast with what I shall call compound country names, which are names that can be split up into a simple country name and a constituent that is not a country name. Usually, this non-name constituent denotes a type of governance (kingdom, republic, federation, etc.), and compound names normally have the structure [governance type] of [simple country name] (combined by the subordinator ‘of’):



[United States] of [America]
[United Kingdom] of [Great Britain and Northern Ireland]
[Federation] of [Micronesia]
[People’s Republic] of [China]



Unlike simple country names, compound country names cannot be used adjectivally, even in Headlinese. The only option available to turn a compound name to adjectival use is to break the compound up into its constituents and use the appropriate (noun/adjective) form of the constituent that is a simple country name (syntactically the head of the noun phrase):



Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia -> [noun] Macedonia / [adjective] Macedonian
People’s Republic of China -> [noun] China / [adjective] Chinese
United States of America -> [noun] ?America1 / [adjective] American



We cannot say “a People’s Republic of China city” or even in Headlinese “People’s Republic of China MP to stand down”; but we can say “a Chinese city” and “Chinese MP to stand down”, and in Headlinese, we can say “China MP to stand down”.


In normal language usage, it is exceedingly common to break up compound names and just use the embedded simple name to refer to the country: we talk about Macedonia, Micronesia, and China much more commonly than about the Federation of Micronesia, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, or the People’s Republic of China.


Some of these compound names have established abbreviations (like FYROM and PRC for the two examples above), since the full versions tend to be rather long.2 These abbreviations normally function in the same way as simple country names: that is, they can be used adjectivally (though only attributively), but only in Headlinese:



[normal] A Macedonian town / *A FYROM town
[Headlinese] FYROM MP to stand down / Macedonian MP to stand down



This in particular is the reason why USA is not used attributively in normal language use. I’m not entirely convinced that it is completely unused in Headlinese (at least outside the States), but even in Headlinese, it is very rare. This is because the US is one of a small set of special cases.



Special cases: US and UK


There are a few special cases: countries that have compound names and where English is the main (if not only) commonly spoken language. We tend to talk about our own countries a lot more than we do about other countries, and while we may be all right talking about a seven-syllable São Tomé and Príncipe however often the name pops up in conversation, constantly talking about a massive fifteen-syllable United Kingdom of Great Britatin and Northern Ireland is far too much of a mouthful for us lazy humans. So we shorten the names.


In some cases, we can do this just by using the territory name alone (the Republic of Ireland is frequently referred to as just Ireland, for example), but not always. In some cases, this leads to ambiguity: Ireland is also the name of the entire island (encompassing Northern Ireland as well), and America is also the entire continent. In other cases, the territory name is itself rather a mouthful and not easily simplified: Great Britain and Northern Ireland is still nine syllables.


In these cases, the alternative solution is to ditch the territory name and use the ‘governance type’ constituent on its own. Since this is done mainly by people who actually live in the country, it’s usually obvious which republic, federation, kingdom, or other state type they’re talking about—and luckily, the three examples mentioned above are the only common ones, and they have three different governance types, so you won’t get them mixed up:



the Republic [of Ireland]
the United States [of America]
the United Kingdom [of Great Britain and Northern Ireland]



The resulting shortened names are, as you can see, not compound anymore. They contain only a single constituent, which (although it’s a governance type) now refers synecdochically to the territory. So it’s now a simple country name, rather than a compound country name. And to no one’s surprise, these new simple names function just like all other simple country names: they can be used adjectivally, though only attributively. Since the shortened names have no corresponding adjectives (the normal adjectives being correspondent to the full, compound names), there is no blocking process to favour an adjective over the noun, and the attributive forms are used even outside Headlinese, as in the example in the question:2



He’s a United States senator



Even the shortened names the United States and the United Kingdom are still five and six syllables long, respectively, and it’s not entirely surprising that they should be abbreviated in the same way that many compound names (including the United States of America) are. So United States becomes US, and United Kingdom becomes UK. Republic is short enough—no need to further abbreviate that.


These are in the somewhat unusual position of being abbreviations of simple nouns rather than compound nouns, and the limitations for using them adjectivally are a bit different as well. Compound noun abbreviations are used in the same way as simple country names: attributive use only, and only in Headlinese. Attributive use is not found in normal use, where instead you use the preferred attributive form of the head noun in the non-abbreviated compound name; i.e., you basically undo the abbreviation before applying the normal compound-name rules (leaving you with a nice and short form). Here, though, undoing the abbreviation leaves you with rather a long simple noun, and with no other way of shortening it.


This discrepancy between UK/US and other abbreviations is apparently motivation enough to allow normal, non-Headlinese attributive use of the abbreviations. The only alternative would be to use the non-abbreviated forms, and five syllables for your own country is apparently just too much to deal with.


Of course, this means we have two super-practical (disyllabic!) ways of referring to ‘our own’ countries, which is just what we want. Naturally, their usage is extremely widespread. I suspect the common use of US and its immediate similarity to USA is a big part of the reason why even Headlinese prefers the former to the latter. It’s basically just blocking again.




1 This form is somewhat questionable. Theoretically, “America MP to stand down” works in Headlinese; but since the commonly used abbreviation (see further down) is so much shorter, Headlinese, which goes for shorter forms, never favours it.


2 It is interesting that the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland does not have an abbreviation at all. The only abbreviation found is UK, which is from the shortened form (see “Special Cases”).


3 Republic is a bit of an exeption to this: it is rarely used attributively outside Headlinese. When talking about the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland in opposition to one another, Irish people in general avoid adjectival use entirely and recast their sentences to say “in the Republic” and “in the North/Six Counties”, respectively.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

verbs - "Baby is creeping" vs. "baby is crawling" in AmE

Years and years ago, I remember reading in a book on AmE usage that the phrasal turn a baby creeps before it walks was to some extent more common to AmE than to BrE, which preferred exclusively the "crawl" version. And so, I just recently checked on the accuracy of that information on NGram Viewer , and it actually was fact... more than a century ago! What I would like you to tell is if it would sound sort of weird to hear someone say today in the US that a child "creeps" before walking and running (see Synonyms ) rather than it crawls. Also, what's the story to those terms? How did "to crawl" come to prevail and supersede "to creep" to describe the way a baby moves around? As with a plant, so with a child. His mind grows by natural stages. A child creeps before he walks , sits before he stands, cries before he laughs, babbles before he talks, draws a circle before he draws a square, lies before he tells the truth, and is selfish before he
Read more

commas - Does this sentence have too many subjunctives?

Does this sentence have too many subjunctives? If it please the king, let it be decreed that they be destroyed, and I will pay 10,000 talents of silver into the hands of those who have charge of the king's business, that they may put it into the king's treasuries. I am stumped by this sentence construction. First, there is "Let it be," which is a common English idiomatic phrase, but then it follows another subjunctive. Is that to say you can actually have a subjunctive followed by another subjunctive? Also, why does the sentence use "please"? If that's the subjunctive tense there, then why is it followed by another subjunctive instead of a conditional, or maybe "Let it be" is the conditional? Lastly, I wish to know how the that is used in the sentence. Perhaps, the simplified sentence can be restated like so: Let it be decreed that they be destroyed and that they may put it into the king's treasuries. If not, maybe the simplified sent
Read more

time - English notation for hour, minutes and seconds

I often see English notation about time using the " and ' symbols. I have always mistaken about the two, and even their meaning. I'm more used to "01:05:56", for example. How do you represent the hour, minutes, and seconds using the apostrophe and quotes punctuations? Which is for the hour, which is for minutes, and which is for seconds? Is it the common way to write duration of time elapsed? Do they have a special pronunciation? Answer It's not particularly common for expressions of time. It's similar to degrees-minutes-seconds: instead of decimal degrees (38.897212°,-77.036519°) you write (38° 53′ 49.9632″, -77° 2′ 11.4678″). Both are derived from a sexagesimal counting system such as that devised in Ancient Babylon: the single prime represents the first sexagesimal division and the second the next, and so on. 17th-century astronomers used a third division of 1/60th of a second. The advantage of using minute and second symbols for time is that it o
Read more

grammatical number - Use of lone apostrophe for plural?

I've been reading William Manchester's book "American Caesar", which is about Douglas MacArthur, and I found that he uses a strange convention for pluralizing the family name. When talking about the MacArthurs as a whole, he writes MacArthur' with an apostrophe, as in "After the war, the MacArthur' lived in Tokyo while the general was proconsul" (yes, he uses that term to describe him). I have never seen or heard of a rule that would prescribe this. Manchester is a bit old-timey in his style: for example, he also writes "in behalf of" instead of "on behalf of", which is the only one I have ever seen. So perhaps this is similar. Where does he get this apostrophe from? Edit: There seems to be some difficulty finding examples, which is odd. Here is a direct link to a page from Google Books that shows the apostrophe.
Read more

etymology - Origin of "s--t eating grin"

What is the origin of the phrase shit eating grin ? How did it come to mean showing smugness or self-satisfaction of an individual's actions? Answer From the Urban Dictionary: ...these uses are documented in the Oxford English Dictionary no earlier than 1957 There have been similar expressions used quite far back: In Book XXI of his History of Rome, Livy describes a Carthaginian sect of coprophages, the risus faecivorus, or shit-eating grin, being commonly displayed by its adherents. Although, its origin is undetermined, they may have been incidents which caused the invention of this phrase. Below is an excerpt: "1944 Jrnl. Nerv. & Mental Dis. XCIX. 959 Among demented patients in advanced stages of their illness,..it is not rare to see some of them grasp their own feces, chew them and eat them often with great pleasure and satisfaction (coprophagia).
Read more

etymology - Where does the phrase "doctored" originate?

This is a phrase I’m particularly confused about, because it’s used often when something is manipulated or changed. For example, sometimes images surface online that are clearly Photoshopped, but people refer to them as “doctored” images. Why use the word “doctored” here? Answer The earliest Google Books match for an instance of doctored in a transitional (or perhaps post-transitional) sense between "amended" and "adulterated" appears in William Marshall, The Rural Economy of Glocestershire; Including Its Dairy: Together with the Dairy Management of North Wiltshire, and the Management of Orchards and Fruit Liquor, in Herefordshire , volume 2 (1789): Men in general, however, whose palates are set to rough cider, consider the common sweet sort as an effeminate beverage; and rough cider, properly manufactured, is probably the most generous liquor; being deemed more wholesome, to habits in general, than sweet cider:—even when genuine. That which is drank, in the kingd
Read more

word choice - Which is the correct spelling: “fairy” or “faerie”?

Fairy vs. faerie — which is the correct spelling? Answer As others have noted, fairy is the standard modern spelling, and faerie is a pseudo-archaism. However, in some contexts there is now a semantic distinction between the two spellings! In particular, fairy tales and the associated idea of fairies typically refer to the genre of folk stories printed by the Brothers Grimm, then sweetened and popularized for modern audiences by Disney et al. Faerie stories , on the other hand, are stories about the fae : otherworldly, unpredictable, and dangerous creatures who appear in the folk-tales and myths of England and Ireland. In origin, of course, the fairies and the fae are one and the same, but the connotations and usage of the words today are headed in opposite directions. A Google image search for fairy vs. faerie shows a lot of overlap, but some very significant differences in tone and content between the two terms. Note that the search for "fairy" turns up a number
Read more