homonyms - Patient patient


The other day one of my students asked me an interesting question: why is patient as an adjective identical to patient as a noun? Isn't it because a patient has to be patient to recover (follow the doctor's advice etc.)?


According to the Online Etymology Dictionary, the adjective "patient" means "pertaining to a medical patient". But the adjective seems to be older than the noun... So, is there a direct connection between the words? I know that they have the same French/Latin origin. But my question is more about the very concepts of being a medical patient and having patience.



Answer



The OED, for the verb :



to make patient' or 'to be patient'



gives references to both the French pacient and the Latin patientem which are present in English at about the same time, but originally with different spellings.



1551 R. Robinson tr. T. More Vtopia sig. Eiii Patient iourself, good maister Freare (quod he)..and be not angry.


1561 T. Norton & T. Sackville Gorboduc iv. ii. F iij b Pacient your grace, perhappes he liueth yet.



Later, the spellings converge.



For the adjective :



Enduring pain, affliction, inconvenience, etc., calmly, without discontent or complaint; characterized by or showing such endurance.



the OED gives



c1350 Apocalypse St. John: A Version (Harl. 874) (1961) 4 (MED) His entent is to amonesten to be pacient, for þorouȝ þouȝt alle þe tribulaciouns..ben hard & stronge forto suffren.



The OED gives several references in the French spelling then it appears to merge with the Latin spelling with Shakespeare :



1600 Shakespeare Merchant of Venice i. iii. 108 Manie a time..you haue rated me..Still haue I borne it with a patient shrug.




The OED also gives a somewhat different shade of meaning to the adjective :



Able to wait calmly; quietly expectant; not hasty or impetuous.



and references this back to the Wycliffe bible of 1382, again with the French spelling :



1382 Bible (Wycliffite, E.V.) (Bodl. 959) (1965) Ecclus. vii. 9 Betere is a pacient man þan þe enhauncynge hymselue




They list yet another meaning



Undergoing the action of another; passive; (also) achieved or acquired inwardly. Chiefly in contrast with active, agent. Obs.



and reference this to, first the French and then the Latin spelling :



a1425 tr. Guy de Chauliac Grande Chirurgie (N.Y. Acad. Med.) f. 76v (MED) Cause particler, pacient, or suffryng [L. Causa particularis patiens], was disposicioun of þe body as cachochimia, i. yuel chimez, & debilitacioun & opilacioun. a1522 G. Douglas tr. Virgil Æneid (1957) II. 22 The ayr and the fyr is actyve, and the watyr and the erth patient.



It is interesting to see the scope of the concept - first patience, then the acceptance of ministering from another, then the idea of a 'patient' emerging.



Then, the noun :



A person receiving or (in later use) registered to receive medical treatment, esp. at a particular establishment or from a particular practitioner; a person staying in a hospital for medical treatment.



is also referenced with both spellings (French and Latin) :



1387-95 Chaucer Canterbury Tales Prol. 415 He kepte his pacient a ful greet deel In houres by his magik natureel.


a1500 tr. Lanfranc Sci. Cirurgie (Wellcome) f.28 (MED) If þe mater be mechill, the mater shall be þrest lytill and lytill, namely if þe pacient be febill.


1547 A. Borde Breuiary of Helthe i. Proheme f. iiii Chierurgions ought..nat to be boystiouse aboute his pacientes but louyngly to comfort them.


1623 Shakespeare & J. Fletcher Henry VIII iii. ii. 41 He brings his Physicke After his Patients death



firstly with the French and then (again in Shakespeare) the Latin spellings.



It is interesting to see both the origins (French and Latin) come into English simultaneously, with, initially, their respective spellings. And also to see that slightly different meanings are being brought in as well.


I think it would be a rather large study to sort out the several subtleties of meaning, perhaps the several localised or dialectic shades of usage, and to track the merging of the two spellings.


But it is an interesting example of how English formed.



All references from OED


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

verbs - "Baby is creeping" vs. "baby is crawling" in AmE

Years and years ago, I remember reading in a book on AmE usage that the phrasal turn a baby creeps before it walks was to some extent more common to AmE than to BrE, which preferred exclusively the "crawl" version. And so, I just recently checked on the accuracy of that information on NGram Viewer , and it actually was fact... more than a century ago! What I would like you to tell is if it would sound sort of weird to hear someone say today in the US that a child "creeps" before walking and running (see Synonyms ) rather than it crawls. Also, what's the story to those terms? How did "to crawl" come to prevail and supersede "to creep" to describe the way a baby moves around? As with a plant, so with a child. His mind grows by natural stages. A child creeps before he walks , sits before he stands, cries before he laughs, babbles before he talks, draws a circle before he draws a square, lies before he tells the truth, and is selfish before he
Read more

commas - Does this sentence have too many subjunctives?

Does this sentence have too many subjunctives? If it please the king, let it be decreed that they be destroyed, and I will pay 10,000 talents of silver into the hands of those who have charge of the king's business, that they may put it into the king's treasuries. I am stumped by this sentence construction. First, there is "Let it be," which is a common English idiomatic phrase, but then it follows another subjunctive. Is that to say you can actually have a subjunctive followed by another subjunctive? Also, why does the sentence use "please"? If that's the subjunctive tense there, then why is it followed by another subjunctive instead of a conditional, or maybe "Let it be" is the conditional? Lastly, I wish to know how the that is used in the sentence. Perhaps, the simplified sentence can be restated like so: Let it be decreed that they be destroyed and that they may put it into the king's treasuries. If not, maybe the simplified sent
Read more

grammatical number - Use of lone apostrophe for plural?

I've been reading William Manchester's book "American Caesar", which is about Douglas MacArthur, and I found that he uses a strange convention for pluralizing the family name. When talking about the MacArthurs as a whole, he writes MacArthur' with an apostrophe, as in "After the war, the MacArthur' lived in Tokyo while the general was proconsul" (yes, he uses that term to describe him). I have never seen or heard of a rule that would prescribe this. Manchester is a bit old-timey in his style: for example, he also writes "in behalf of" instead of "on behalf of", which is the only one I have ever seen. So perhaps this is similar. Where does he get this apostrophe from? Edit: There seems to be some difficulty finding examples, which is odd. Here is a direct link to a page from Google Books that shows the apostrophe.
Read more

etymology - Where does the phrase "doctored" originate?

This is a phrase I’m particularly confused about, because it’s used often when something is manipulated or changed. For example, sometimes images surface online that are clearly Photoshopped, but people refer to them as “doctored” images. Why use the word “doctored” here? Answer The earliest Google Books match for an instance of doctored in a transitional (or perhaps post-transitional) sense between "amended" and "adulterated" appears in William Marshall, The Rural Economy of Glocestershire; Including Its Dairy: Together with the Dairy Management of North Wiltshire, and the Management of Orchards and Fruit Liquor, in Herefordshire , volume 2 (1789): Men in general, however, whose palates are set to rough cider, consider the common sweet sort as an effeminate beverage; and rough cider, properly manufactured, is probably the most generous liquor; being deemed more wholesome, to habits in general, than sweet cider:—even when genuine. That which is drank, in the kingd
Read more

phrases - Somebody is gonna kiss the donkey

I heard this phrase when I was watching Battleship. An old man said, "Somebody is gonna kiss the donkey." I do not know what it means, I only heard it in a movie. What is this phrase mean? In Addition: I think it was Rihanna who said "Saddle Ridge will be in weapons range in five minutes," then the old man stated the phrase. Answer It is a confused attempt at a play on (for example) "kiss my ass," or, some similar phrase. It is quite common in English today that idioms get mangled.
Read more

typography - When a dagger is used to indicate a note, must it come after an asterisk?

The typographical symbol dagger (†) has several meanings. Possibly its most common use is as a footnote marker. According to You Have a Point There: A Guide to Punctuation and Its Allies ( Partridge , 1953), when it is used for this purpose, it must be used for second footnotes only; the first footnote should be indicated by an asterisk (*), the third a double dagger (‡) and further footnotes other symbols or numbers. Where does Patridge's rule fall on a scale of one to ten, where one is "this is just one guy's random opinion" and ten is "this is a widely accepted rule of English and any deviation from it is unarguably incorrect"? This question was inspired by this Meta Stack Overflow question about the use of daggers on Stack Exchange site FAQ pages . Answer The dagger (also known as an obelisk ) is properly used for the second footnote. The asterisk is for the first, and the double dagger is for the third. This is supported by several websites: And so
Read more

etymology - Origin of "s--t eating grin"

What is the origin of the phrase shit eating grin ? How did it come to mean showing smugness or self-satisfaction of an individual's actions? Answer From the Urban Dictionary: ...these uses are documented in the Oxford English Dictionary no earlier than 1957 There have been similar expressions used quite far back: In Book XXI of his History of Rome, Livy describes a Carthaginian sect of coprophages, the risus faecivorus, or shit-eating grin, being commonly displayed by its adherents. Although, its origin is undetermined, they may have been incidents which caused the invention of this phrase. Below is an excerpt: "1944 Jrnl. Nerv. & Mental Dis. XCIX. 959 Among demented patients in advanced stages of their illness,..it is not rare to see some of them grasp their own feces, chew them and eat them often with great pleasure and satisfaction (coprophagia).
Read more