What is the VP in a subject-dependent inversion?


A canonical declarative clause consists of a subject and a predicate, the former normally being a noun phrase (NP) and the latter mostly a verb phrase (VP). Therefore, a canonical declarative clause is divided into two large chunks: NP + VP.


In a subject-dependent inversion, on the other hand, the clause has the construction of 'dependent + verb + subject' as in:



Under the table lies a dog.



Where 'under the table' is the dependent, 'lies' is the verb, and 'a dog' is the subject.


Now, is this inverted sentence also divided into two large chunks? If so, what is the VP in this case? Is it 'Under the table lies' as follows?



Under the table lies (VP) + a dog (NP)



Or should this sentence be divided differently with a different VP?




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

commas - Does this sentence have too many subjunctives?

verbs - "Baby is creeping" vs. "baby is crawling" in AmE

time - English notation for hour, minutes and seconds

etymology - Origin of "s--t eating grin"

grammatical number - Use of lone apostrophe for plural?

etymology - Where does the phrase "doctored" originate?

single word requests - What do you call hypothetical inhabitants living on the Moon?