subjunctive mood - Be it that,were to, and should - what were the differences between these conditionals?




  1. Be it that John ask me, I shall answer him.

  2. Should John ask me, I will (or should? or would?) answer him.

  3. Were John to ask me, I would answer him.



When writers used the foregoing constructions, how, and according to what rule, did the meanings of the other three differ from one another?


Thank you.


-Hal




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

etymology - Origin of "s--t eating grin"

First floor vs ground floor, usage origin

usage - "there doesn't seem" vs. "there don't seem"

pronunciation - Where does the intrusive R come from in “warsh”?

Abbreviation of "Street"

etymology - Since when has "a hot minute" meant a long time?

meaning - What is synonyme of "scale"?