word order - Why was the flow of this sentence changed?


One editor of mine changed the noun order in a sentence of my article. It seems minor, but I would like to figure out the reason. Is it just because the revision makes the sentence flow sound better? Like, we had better put a word of more vowels at the end of a sentence instead of the middle?


Below please see the change. Please kindly advise. Thanks!


Original Version:



“The path of Chinese discipline to internationalisation is heavy and long!”



Revised Version:



“The path of Chinese discipline to internationalisation is long and heavy!”




Answer



This word order is a cultural convention (not a requirement of logic). It therefore sounds more "natural" to native speakers.


There is a word order for English adjectives:



Opinion Size Age Shape Colour Material Origin Purpose



The problem: Weight does not fit in here. The principle might be the same, i.e. a convention that says that size comes before weight. I asked this here.


Too complicate things more, there is another rule that exempts the above rule but this happens quite seldom (e.g. it's Big Bad Wolf, not Bad Big Wolf). It requires the order of vowels to be ⟨i⟩, ⟨a⟩, ⟨o⟩ (or in IPA: /ɪ/, /æ/, /ɔ/. For instance:



ding, dang, dong



The first vowel in heavy, /ɛ/, is close to /æ/. So my first thought was that "long and heavy" should comply with this rule. But it does not. This might have several reasons. Firstly, it's not an instance of reduplication. Secondly, the words are separated by and.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

verbs - "Baby is creeping" vs. "baby is crawling" in AmE

commas - Does this sentence have too many subjunctives?

time - English notation for hour, minutes and seconds

grammatical number - Use of lone apostrophe for plural?

etymology - Origin of "s--t eating grin"

etymology - Where does the phrase "doctored" originate?

word choice - Which is the correct spelling: “fairy” or “faerie”?