word choice - Is there a difference in meaning between "does not seem to" and "seems not to"?


Consider the following sentences:




  1. Try not to be alarmed if a rule doesn’t seem to work for a specific sentence.

  2. Try not to be alarmed if a rule seems not to work for a specific sentence.



Is there a difference in meaning between "does not seem to work" and "seems not to work"?



Answer



No, there is no difference.


Seem is a verb that governs infinitive complements and allows Negative-Raising. That means that negation in the infinitive complement of seem, or want, or other Neg-Raising verbs, as in



  • The rule seems not to work.           [ = ... to not work]

  • He wants me not to go tomorrow. [ = ... to not go tomorrow.]


can also appear, instead, in the matrix clause with seem or want



  • The rule doesn't seem to work.

  • He doesn't want me to go tomorrow.


without a change in meaning.


This is not true of most predicates, which don't allow Neg-Raising. (Be) Easy, for instance, is a more normal predicate; the two sentences below do not mean the same thing.



  • It's easy for him not to smile.

  • It's not easy for him to smile.



Edit: Pursuant to RegDwight's comment above on split infinitives, I should mention that both the unsplit variant not to smile and the split variant to not smile are in the complement clause, i.e, not Neg-Raised -- though they are likewise equivalent in grammaticality and meaning. Either form can be regarded as the "source" of the Neg-Raised not easy to smile



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

verbs - "Baby is creeping" vs. "baby is crawling" in AmE

commas - Does this sentence have too many subjunctives?

time - English notation for hour, minutes and seconds

grammatical number - Use of lone apostrophe for plural?

etymology - Origin of "s--t eating grin"

etymology - Where does the phrase "doctored" originate?

word choice - Which is the correct spelling: “fairy” or “faerie”?