nouns - Why are there different ways of indicating gender for animals?
Why are there different ways of indicating gender for animals? For instance, by inflexion we get:
lion (male) & lioness (female)
where the female is distinguished from the male. Here the male is also known by the general (have I used this correctly?) term for this type of animal, i.e. lion.
But, in another instance, we have:
duck (female) & drake (male)
where the male is distinguished from the female by a distinct or different word and also from the general term for this type of fowl, i.e. duck.
Then, for kangaroos and rabbits, we have:
buck (male) & doe (female)
where neither are known by the general term, nor is there any inflexion; instead, distinct names are used.
Why do these different ways for indicating gender exist? Why is it that in some cases the male is differentiated from the female and vice-versa. And why in some cases are both female and male known by words so different from the general term used to describe them?
Answer
To take one of your examples, doe is from old English deon, to suck, and was used to describe a female animal of a number of kinds. buck is from old English bucca, a he-goat. The unisex rabbit is from Flemish. So the words buck and doe appear originally to have meant the male and female of any animal, and have presumably become specialised in referring to deer, rabbits, and certain other kinds of animals.
Ram and sheep are both derived from old English, in the case of ram a word meaning fighting sheep. (Ewe is from Latin.) I'd hazard a guess that in old England there were fighting sheep (males) and sheep (all the others, including wethers).
Hope this helps (all this from the Collins English Dictionary, except the suppositions and guesswork).
Comments
Post a Comment