tenses - When is "backshifting" optional?


In reported speech, tenses are generally backshifted. If what was said is still true at the time of reporting then back shifting is optional. My question is, if someone doesn't backshift the tense knowing for a fact that the statement is no longer true, is that still acceptable?


For example, suppose John tells me today:



I am hungry.



Then two days later, I happen to tell my friend:



John said that he is hungry.



Even though I know that John is no longer hungry, I used the present simple tense (is). Is this usage correct?




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

etymology - Origin of "s--t eating grin"

First floor vs ground floor, usage origin

usage - "there doesn't seem" vs. "there don't seem"

pronunciation - Where does the intrusive R come from in “warsh”?

Abbreviation of "Street"

etymology - Since when has "a hot minute" meant a long time?

meaning - What is synonyme of "scale"?