verbs - "named" vs "that is named"


I want to describe my business and want to refer to it in a sentence.


I am trying to say:



"In 2015 we established a business (that is) named X".



Intuitively, the "that is" part is redundant, and makes the sentence more cumbersome. But I cannot think of a reason why we should be able to drop the verb.


Is the version without the "that is" part grammatically correct? How can it be explained?




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

etymology - Origin of "s--t eating grin"

First floor vs ground floor, usage origin

usage - "there doesn't seem" vs. "there don't seem"

pronunciation - Where does the intrusive R come from in “warsh”?

Abbreviation of "Street"

etymology - Since when has "a hot minute" meant a long time?

meaning - What is synonyme of "scale"?