etymology - Rhetoric vs. Mathematics: ellipsis/ellipse, parable/parabola, hyperbole/hyperbola


Do ellipsis, parable, and hyperbole from rhetoric have anything in common with the geometric curves ellipse, parabola, and hyperbola used in mathematics?


There are three geometric curves known as conic sections:




  1. Ellipse: a curve on a plane surrounding two focal points such that a straight line drawn from one of the focal points to any point on the curve and then back to the other focal point has the same length for every point on the curve.




  2. Parabola: a two-dimensional, mirror-symmetrical curve, which is approximately U-shaped when oriented as shown in the diagram.




  3. Hyperbola: has two pieces, called connected components or branches, that are mirror images of each other and resemble two infinite bows.




There are also three terms in linguistics with analogous names (in many languages with the same names, actually):




  1. Ellipsis: the omission from a clause of one or more words that are nevertheless understood in the context of the remaining elements.



    • John can play the guitar, and Mary can play the violin.




  2. Parable: a succinct, didactic story, in prose or verse, which illustrates one or more instructive lessons or principles.





  3. Hyperbole: is the use of exaggeration as a rhetorical device or figure of speech.



    • That suitcase weighed a ton!




Do they have anything in common? Is there any etymological or other reason connecting each pair together? Does the ellipsis remind the ellipse in any way, etc.? Is there any analogy between them?



Answer



In Ancient Greek, where both the rhetorical and geometrical terms were invented, they are the same words, employed in different figurative senses:



  • A ‘parabole’ is a ‘casting/setting side by side’—using Latin-derived morphs an ‘apposition’ or ‘adjacency’. In rhetoric, it is a comparison, which sets two terms side-by-side; later it denotes a fiction which is ‘set beside’ and parallels (‘lies next to’) reality. In geometry, it is a conic section formed by the intersection of a cone with a plane with the same inclination to the axis as one of the cone’s sides—the plane is parallel to that side.

  • A ‘hyperbole’ is a literally a ‘casting/setting above’, more generally an excess. In rhetoric it is an exaggeration, something which speaks of something in excessive terms. In geometry it is another conic section formed by the intersection of a plane with both branches of a cone, in which the inclination of the cutting plane to the axis exceeds that of the cone’s side

  • An ‘ellipsis’ is a ‘falling short, deficiency’. In rhetoric, it denotes the omission of one or more words needed to complete the sense—the utterance thus falls short of completion. In geometry it is a conic section in which the cutting plane’s inclination is less than—falls short of—the inclination of the cone’s side.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

verbs - "Baby is creeping" vs. "baby is crawling" in AmE

commas - Does this sentence have too many subjunctives?

grammatical number - Use of lone apostrophe for plural?

etymology - Where does the phrase "doctored" originate?

phrases - Somebody is gonna kiss the donkey

typography - When a dagger is used to indicate a note, must it come after an asterisk?

etymology - Origin of "s--t eating grin"