word choice - Differences between no child vs no children


a) They have no child. b) They have no children.


Are both a) and b) correct? Though b) seems more common.



Answer



Swan in Practical English Usage (p352) has a good entry on this question:



After no, countable nouns are usually plural unless the sense makes a singular noun necessary. Compare:




  • He's got no children. (More natural than He's got no child.)




  • He's got no wife. (More normal than He's got no wives.)





So, They have no children is indeed more common and natural than They have no child. Conversely, They have no car seems more natural than They have no cars.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

etymology - Origin of "s--t eating grin"

etymology - Since when has "a hot minute" meant a long time?

etymology - Why "silver-tongued" for someone who is convincing?

usage - "there doesn't seem" vs. "there don't seem"

etymology - Origin of "queer as a clockwork orange"

First floor vs ground floor, usage origin

meaning - What is meant by "don't piss on my boots and tell me it's raining"?