grammar - Can we 'do evil'?


On another post discussion has moved to what one can and cannot 'do'. We 'do our duty', we do our homework' and we 'do the washing-up'. But we cannot 'do dancing', 'do driving', or 'do charity'- or can we? What is it that determines what we can or cannot 'do'?



Answer



Do is a very special verb that participates in innumerable idioms, fixed phrases, and constructions.


It's the default auxiliary verb, totally meaningless, inserted when an auxiliary is needed for a rule
like Negative-Placement, Negative-Contraction, Subject-Auxiliary Inversion, or Tag Formation:



  • Bill likes honey ~ Bill does not like honey ~ Bill doesn't like honey

  • Does Bill like honey? ~ Bill likes honey, doesn't he?


But that's not the do we're talking about here.


Then there's emphatic stressed do, as in



  • He does live in that building, I tell you!


But that's not the do we want, either.


This do actually has a meaning, though only a very general one.
It means the predicate ACT, in the sense of 'cause something to happen by performing an action'.
This do is a pro-verb that can be used to substitute for an active verb phrase; but it must be active.



  • What I told him to do was [to rent the house/to buy cookies/to be honest]

  • **What I told him to do was [to own the house/to want cookies/to be tall]*


Rent the house, buy cookies, and be honest are active verb phrases. They describe actions.
Own the house, want cookies, and be tall are stative verb phrases. They describe states.
That's why the second group of sentences above are ungrammatical. Action do requires active VPs.


The construction being asked about is a transitive action do: do something.
The question then is:



What can be "something"?



The answer is:



Any word or phrase that can be interpreted as an active verb phrase can be "something".



For example, a direct object may invoke a verb:



  • They do shrimp in lobster sauce very well here. do = 'prepare, cook'

  • On this tour, she will do Chopin only. do = 'perform, play'

  • She never does the cobwebs in the corners. do = 'perform, clean'


or a noun may refer to a related verb:



  • She does the skiing well, but not the shooting. do = 'perform, ski; perform, shoot'

  • I've never done accounting, only my taxes. do = 'perform, bureaucratize'

  • He's going to do the summation. do = 'perform, summarize'


The default indefinite object of transitive action do is a construction with thing.
Note, however, that these "things" are always actions, not material things.



  • He did something funny to the onions. ~ Did you do anything funny to the onions?

  • The things he's done would fill a book. ~ The things he was told to do would fill another.


and if it is obvious that some thing is intended, it may be deleted like any indefinite.



  • He always does good things. ~ He always does good.


but notice that this is not normally possible, except generically:



  • He does good = He always does good.

  • He did a good thing at 3:48 this morning. but * He did good at 3:48 this morning.


As to what "good" and "evil" mean, in these or any other contexts, consult your local philosopher.
It is certain, however, that in English one can grammatically, if only generically,
do good and do evil.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

etymology - Origin of "s--t eating grin"

What is the origin of the phrase shit eating grin ? How did it come to mean showing smugness or self-satisfaction of an individual's actions? Answer From the Urban Dictionary: ...these uses are documented in the Oxford English Dictionary no earlier than 1957 There have been similar expressions used quite far back: In Book XXI of his History of Rome, Livy describes a Carthaginian sect of coprophages, the risus faecivorus, or shit-eating grin, being commonly displayed by its adherents. Although, its origin is undetermined, they may have been incidents which caused the invention of this phrase. Below is an excerpt: "1944 Jrnl. Nerv. & Mental Dis. XCIX. 959 Among demented patients in advanced stages of their illness,..it is not rare to see some of them grasp their own feces, chew them and eat them often with great pleasure and satisfaction (coprophagia).
Read more

usage - "there doesn't seem" vs. "there don't seem"

As an example, consider the two sentences: There don't seem to be any doctors here. and There doesn't seem to be any doctors here. To my ear, the first sounds great, and the second is painfully awkward. So which is correct, grammatically? I've found lots of disagreement on this around the Web, with various sources citing different ways of treating the word "any" (as singular, always, or as either depending on to what it refers). No consensus, however, could I locate. Answer The relevant article in ‘The Cambridge Guide to English Usage’ says: Existential there couples with either singular or plural verbs ( there is / there are , according to the following noun phrase) . . . This formal agreement is strictly maintained in academic writing. But in narrative and everyday writing, there is and especially there’s is found even with plural nouns. The same consideration applies to There don’t and There doesn’t . What it means for your examples is that it all depends ...
Read more

First floor vs ground floor, usage origin

Ground floor – First floor: In British English, the floor of a building which is level with the ground is called the ground floor. The floor above it is called the first floor, the floor above that is the second floor, and so on. In American English, the floor which is level with the ground is called the first floor, the floor above it is the second floor, and so on. (Collins COBUILD English Usage) Though there are exceptions to the above-mentioned usage,( and exceptions are not the issue here) in public buildings in the U.S., for instance, it’s also possible to call the street-level floor the ground floor, like in Britain, but how come that in the UK and Europe the ground level floor and the first floor are respectively referred to as the first floor and the second floor in the U.S. (and so on for higher floors) . Was it a custom imported into the U.S. from a different culture? Related: "Ground floor" vs. "first floor" .
Read more

meaning - What is synonyme of "scale"?

What is the meaning of the word "scale" in both cases? http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/scale I couldn't find the appropriate meaning in the dictionary. “For any new table reservations product, no matter how good it is, it’s very hard to get businesses to adopt the product at scale for two reasons. First, it is hard to scale a sales team without massive funding. Answer The word scale can have many meanings and can act as both noun and verb. Source 1 In your case, for understanding the meaning of at scale in the first sentence, see this thread . In the second sentence, it is being used as a phrasal verb ( Source 2 ) and in this context, it means to increase the size of the sales team .
Read more

etymology - Since when has "a hot minute" meant a long time?

The term a hot minute can be found all over blogs and in casual speech, meaning essentially, "a long time." The term is mostly slang, but seems to have become popular enough to appear on sites as reputable as PBS.org. Delia pretends to be mad about it for a hot minute but gets over it pretty quickly because the love of her life is finally home. I can't find it defined in reputable dictionaries, but The New York Times confirms the meaning in this article about slang uses of the word "hot." Hottie is still bandied about on campus by not-quite-with-it seniors, and a hot minute is defined as “a long time.” There is life left in the cleaned-up meaning of hot mess, which has come to mean “disheveled” or “incompetent,” as in “I was a hot mess this morning before I hit the shower.” The term reminds me of "A New York Minute," which means the exact opposite, "a very short time." So what is the origin of the term "a hot minute," and how lo...
Read more

meaning - "Instable" or "unstable"?

From my experience, it seems that although unstable is more commonly used, instable is often preferred in engineering and scientific contexts, e.g. "aircraft instability", "instable algorithm". Are there any differences in the implied meaning of the two terms? Should unstable be preferred? Answer I have not seen the word "instable" being used often. The word "instability" exists, though. Funnily, the word "unstability" does not exist. And even in engineering, the same two words are used - "unstable sorting algorithm", "unstable equilibrium", and as you said, "aircraft instability". Instability is just the noun form of unstable. EDIT from comments: The word "unstability" does exist, apparently, but is rarely used. I personally have never seen it. Even the spell check in Firefox marks it as a spelling mistake and suggests "instability" instead.
Read more

time - English notation for hour, minutes and seconds

I often see English notation about time using the " and ' symbols. I have always mistaken about the two, and even their meaning. I'm more used to "01:05:56", for example. How do you represent the hour, minutes, and seconds using the apostrophe and quotes punctuations? Which is for the hour, which is for minutes, and which is for seconds? Is it the common way to write duration of time elapsed? Do they have a special pronunciation? Answer It's not particularly common for expressions of time. It's similar to degrees-minutes-seconds: instead of decimal degrees (38.897212°,-77.036519°) you write (38° 53′ 49.9632″, -77° 2′ 11.4678″). Both are derived from a sexagesimal counting system such as that devised in Ancient Babylon: the single prime represents the first sexagesimal division and the second the next, and so on. 17th-century astronomers used a third division of 1/60th of a second. The advantage of using minute and second symbols for time is that it o...
Read more