grammar - "If I would go there, I would be in trouble" - correct?


Occasionally I've seen the construct:



If I would [verb], I would [verb].



... used, to indicate that the second clause is a condition of the first. For example,



If I would go there, I would be in trouble.



The way I would usually express this is:



If I [subjunctive-verb], I would [verb].



So for example:



If I went there, I would be in trouble.



Is the former correct, or in common usage among native English speakers anywhere?



Answer



No, the pattern used among English native speakers is as you say:



If I [past tense], I would [infinitive]



Because of native language influence on second language speakers, you may sometimes see "would" in both parts of the sentence, but it's not native usage.


N.B. This doesn't mean that "if I" is never followed by "would" ever ever in English (there seems to be some confusion about this given the corpus examples cited by @kiamlaluno), just that it generally isn't in this particular pattern with the intended meaning. Clearly you can construct other grammatical sentences of English, involving different structures/uses of "would", which do contain the sequence "if I would". ("Every time he asked if I would be able to help, I had to decline.")


(On a theoretical note, I am one of those that would avoid the idea of calling the past tense a "subjunctive" here: it's far from clear that English has a subjunctive paradigm.)


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

verbs - "Baby is creeping" vs. "baby is crawling" in AmE

commas - Does this sentence have too many subjunctives?

time - English notation for hour, minutes and seconds

grammatical number - Use of lone apostrophe for plural?

etymology - Origin of "s--t eating grin"

etymology - Where does the phrase "doctored" originate?

word choice - Which is the correct spelling: “fairy” or “faerie”?