meaning - "Object of" vs. "subject of" -- which one is correct? Does it depend on context?


(Tried to search to see if this question had already been asked, but could not find it amongst the many questions concerning pronoun declension and objects and subjects as parts of speech.)


What, exactly, is the difference between the following two sentences? Are they both correct -- or is one considered more correct in certain contexts or constructions?





  1. Jim's wailing child was the subject of much scrutiny.






  2. Jim's wailing child was the object of much scrutiny.





Each of these usages is ubiquitous, and it's not uncommon to see both within the span of a few sentences. (For example, Google estimates over 60,000 results for "subject of study" "object of study".)


The difficulty seems to be that both words have several senses, and they are somewhat overlapping in this case. As a lover of grammar, I am frustrated that I cannot resolve this question in my mind.


Can anyone help clarify this for me?



Answer



They're both grammatically correct and accepted.


For me though, and if you would like to dissect the nuance between them,


Both of them mean a "person to whom thought or action is directed"


But object emphasizes:



"a person seen as a focus for feelings, thought etc."


ex. an object of affection/ contempt



While subject:



"one who experiences or is subjected to something"


ex. the helpless subject of their cruelty/ ridicule



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

verbs - "Baby is creeping" vs. "baby is crawling" in AmE

commas - Does this sentence have too many subjunctives?

time - English notation for hour, minutes and seconds

grammatical number - Use of lone apostrophe for plural?

etymology - Origin of "s--t eating grin"

etymology - Where does the phrase "doctored" originate?

word choice - Which is the correct spelling: “fairy” or “faerie”?