grammar - Is it required to use "that" here?


First sentence:



I contribute to projects I love.



Second sentence:



I contribute to projects that I love.



I used to use the first one, but I am not sure if it is right or wrong when omitting "that".



Answer



A relative pronoun standing at the front of a simple relative clause may be omitted unless it acts as the subject of the relative clause.



okI contribute to projects that I love.
okI contribute to projects that support children.


okI contribute to projects I love. but not, in formal use,
I contribute to projects support children.





  • NOTE: In conversational use you will occasionally hear a subject relative omitted:



    There are some projects support children I will not contribute to.
    I'll ask the man fixes my car about that.



    But this is not acceptable in formal use, and it is often not acceptable in conversation, either. Recognize it when it you hear it; but I advise you not to emulate it.




When there is other matter before the relative pronoun, it may not be omitted:



This is the bag in which I keep my drumsticks. not the bag in I keep my drumsticks
The exam, passing which is mandatory, is offered in the spring. not The exam, passing is mandatory ...



And the relative term may not be omitted when it acts as a determiner rather than a pronoun:



The author whose essay you are reading was my teacher. not The author essay you are reading ...
He advised caution, which advice was unexpected. not ...caution, advice was unexpected.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

verbs - "Baby is creeping" vs. "baby is crawling" in AmE

commas - Does this sentence have too many subjunctives?

time - English notation for hour, minutes and seconds

grammatical number - Use of lone apostrophe for plural?

etymology - Origin of "s--t eating grin"

etymology - Where does the phrase "doctored" originate?

word choice - Which is the correct spelling: “fairy” or “faerie”?