attachment ambiguity - Is "Betty learned that Albert telephoned after Isaiah visited" ambiguous?



Betty learned that Albert telephoned after Isaiah visited.



Can anybody explain whether "after Isaiah visited" tell us: (1) when Betty learned something about Albert or (2) when Albert telephoned?


Could a large pause between "Albert" and "telephoned" or after "telephoned" disambiguate the sentence in sense (1) or (2) respectively?



(1) Betty learned that Albert [... large pause ...] telephoned after Isaiah visited.


(2) Betty learned that Albert telephoned [... large pause ...] after Isaiah visited.



Also, what are the possible meanings or interpretations in written English? For example, could we conclude that:



(1) Betty learned that Albert telephoned after Isaiah visited. ["after Isaiah visited" attaches to "telephoned"]


(2) Betty learned that Albert telephoned, after Isaiah visited. ["after Isaiah visited" attaches to "learned"]





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

etymology - Origin of "s--t eating grin"

First floor vs ground floor, usage origin

usage - "there doesn't seem" vs. "there don't seem"

pronunciation - Where does the intrusive R come from in “warsh”?

Abbreviation of "Street"

etymology - Since when has "a hot minute" meant a long time?

meaning - What is synonyme of "scale"?