meaning - Had it not been vs If it were not for


I've just seen the following sentence on a band's biography:



Had it not been for a studio theft, the band might never have made that song.



Then I was wondering if I can change this sentence to:



If it were not for a studio theft, the band might never have made that song.



Is the second sentence correct? Are they interchangeable?


Thanks in advance.



Answer



It is correct, however, "If it hadn't been for a studio theft, the band might never have made that song." would be a better choice for, say, exam purposes. If it had not been = Had it not been (this is called inversion) If it were not for = Were it not for Search conditionals for more information.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

verbs - "Baby is creeping" vs. "baby is crawling" in AmE

commas - Does this sentence have too many subjunctives?

time - English notation for hour, minutes and seconds

grammatical number - Use of lone apostrophe for plural?

etymology - Origin of "s--t eating grin"

etymology - Where does the phrase "doctored" originate?

word choice - Which is the correct spelling: “fairy” or “faerie”?