meaning - Had it not been vs If it were not for


I've just seen the following sentence on a band's biography:



Had it not been for a studio theft, the band might never have made that song.



Then I was wondering if I can change this sentence to:



If it were not for a studio theft, the band might never have made that song.



Is the second sentence correct? Are they interchangeable?


Thanks in advance.



Answer



It is correct, however, "If it hadn't been for a studio theft, the band might never have made that song." would be a better choice for, say, exam purposes. If it had not been = Had it not been (this is called inversion) If it were not for = Were it not for Search conditionals for more information.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

etymology - Origin of "s--t eating grin"

First floor vs ground floor, usage origin

usage - "there doesn't seem" vs. "there don't seem"

pronunciation - Where does the intrusive R come from in “warsh”?

Abbreviation of "Street"

etymology - Since when has "a hot minute" meant a long time?

meaning - What is synonyme of "scale"?