meaning - Had it not been vs If it were not for


I've just seen the following sentence on a band's biography:



Had it not been for a studio theft, the band might never have made that song.



Then I was wondering if I can change this sentence to:



If it were not for a studio theft, the band might never have made that song.



Is the second sentence correct? Are they interchangeable?


Thanks in advance.



Answer



It is correct, however, "If it hadn't been for a studio theft, the band might never have made that song." would be a better choice for, say, exam purposes. If it had not been = Had it not been (this is called inversion) If it were not for = Were it not for Search conditionals for more information.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

commas - Does this sentence have too many subjunctives?

verbs - "Baby is creeping" vs. "baby is crawling" in AmE

time - English notation for hour, minutes and seconds

etymology - Origin of "s--t eating grin"

grammatical number - Use of lone apostrophe for plural?

etymology - Where does the phrase "doctored" originate?

single word requests - What do you call hypothetical inhabitants living on the Moon?