pronunciation - Which English words feature reduction of diphthongs like /eɪ/ to /i/?


Consider the following examples:



  • karaoke as /ˈkæ.ɹiˌəʊ.ki/

  • Israel as /ˈɪz.ɹi.əl/

  • al-Qaida as "alky aida"

  • Monday as "mundy"

  • Friday as "fridy"


and possibly:



  • Capernaum as /kəˈpɜːɹ.ni.əm/

  • Sinai as /ˈsaɪniaɪ/


I was unable to find much information about this phenomenon. It seems that in most cases the phonetic environment triggering this reduction is the diphthong being followed by another vowel.


Are there other words that feature this reduction?



Answer



You may not have mentioned this because it seems so obvious, but I think it's useful to note this reduction only occurs in unstressed syllables—primary stress (as in the U.S. pronunciation of ballet) or secondary stress (as in the first syllable of aviation) seems to prevent it.


The English diphthongs that end in a front offglide are /aɪ/, /ɔɪ/ and /eɪ/. Some analyses do not recognize /eɪ/ as a true diphthong, and treat it as somthing like /e/ instead.




  • For /aɪ/, it’s hard for me to evaluate if reduction to /i/ has ever occured. In spelling, both “i” and “y” can represent either the diphthong /aɪ/ or the reduced happY vowel /i~ɪ/. So if there were any cases of historical reduction of /aɪ/ to /i~ɪ/, it would be hard to deduce this from the spelling of words.


    As far as I can tell, there isn’t much evidence of a /aɪ/ to /i/ shift happening historically, but there is some evidence in rhymes that suggests that before the Great Vowel Shift was complete, some word-final vowels went from [əɪ] (the vowel that corresponded to past /iː/, and in mosts contexts future /aɪ/) to [i~ɪ]. See these questions for more details: Was the pronunciation of “symmetry” different in the past?, Rhyming conventions of Early Modern English. I suppose an alternate explanation could be that shortening occured before diphthongization, and the apparent pronunciations of words like symmetry with diphthongs were eye-rhymes or poetic license.




  • The diphthong /ɔɪ/ is pretty rare, relatively speaking, so I don’t know of any examples of possible reduction of this vowel to happY.




Reduction of unstressed /eɪ/


The “long a” sound /eɪ/ has, as you noted, apparently often been subject to reduction to happY in fully unstressed syllables. (It seems to be more common in post-tonic syllables than pre-tonic ones; I haven't found evidence of it affecting the unstressed "a"s in Laocoon, aorta or aedes/Aedes.)


But there aren’t many words where this is relevant; aside from the ones you list, I was only able to find the following. Many of them have alternative pronunciations with unreduced /eɪ/, or other alternatives.




  • Common nouns. So far, I've only found:




    • -aïsm words: archaism /ki.ɪz.m/, /keɪ.ɪz.m/, Judaism /di.ɪz.m/, /deɪ.ɪz.m/, /də.ɪz.m/, /ˈdeɪ.ɪz.m/, Hebraism /breɪ.ɪz.m/, /bri.ɪz.m/(apparently less common, but in Random House dict.).
      Apparently NOT Pharisaism /seɪ.ɪz.m/ (dictionaries assign the pronunciation with /si.ɪz.m/ to the alternate spelling "Phariseeism", although I don't know how they could tell which word someone is using in a spoken context)




    • some -et words from French, in British English: crochet (/ˈkrəʊʃeɪ/, /ˈkrəʊʃi/) and croquet (/ˈkrəʊkeɪ/, /ˈkrəʊki/). I don't think the reduced pronunciations are very common. In American English, these are generally stressed on the second syllable, so reduction is impossible. But ballet is not an example according to the OED.






  • Biblical names: Ishmael /mi.əl/, /meɪ.əl/, Ephraim /reɪ.əm/, /ri.əm/, /rəm/,
    Sinai /naɪ/, /neɪ.aɪ/, old /ni/ (see Wells),
    Not examples: Sarai /raɪ/, /reɪ.aɪ/ (so far, only found this last one in Dict.com/Random House Dict.)




  • Classical Greek names: Nausicaa
    Not examples: Pasiphae and Danae look similar, but they seem to have reduced pronunciations where the vowel is commA/schwa, not happY, possibly due to dissimilation with the following vowel.




  • The following Biblical geographical name apparently used to have “a” pronounced this way, but now no longer does: Canaan /nən/; formerly /niən/ or /njən/ (see Wells)




  • And the following names/proper nouns might possibly have had “a” pronounced this way a long time ago, but I haven’t found any evidence of it: Balaam /ləm/, Pharaoh, Michael, Isaac




There is another interesting thing about some words spelled with “a” before another vowel. Some speakers use /aɪ/ in some of these words instead of /eɪ/ or /i/, although this pronunciation is somewhat stigmatized. This may be influenced by analogy with the word naive. The words I know of where this may occur are: Israel, Naomi (see Wells).


With words ending in the letter "e", such as karaoke and linguine, it's a bit difficult to tell whether the pronunciation of this "e" as /i/ is due to reduction of /eɪ/, analogy with other words spelled with "e" like epitome or hyperbole, or simply difficulty that English speakers have with hearing unstressed word-final front vowels like /e/ as sounds that are distinct from the "happY" vowel /i/. (Other possible factors for linguine are analogy with other Italian pastas that have names ending in /i/, like spaghetti and vermicelli, and dialectal variation in the pronunciation of word-final vowels in Italian, as described in this ELL answer by CoolHandLouis, that might have influenced English pronunciation.)


The word always may have a reduced final vowel; since it is in a closed syllable, [ɪ] is possible instead of [i].


References:


"Canaan and Sinai", John Wells’s phonetic blog


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

verbs - "Baby is creeping" vs. "baby is crawling" in AmE

Years and years ago, I remember reading in a book on AmE usage that the phrasal turn a baby creeps before it walks was to some extent more common to AmE than to BrE, which preferred exclusively the "crawl" version. And so, I just recently checked on the accuracy of that information on NGram Viewer , and it actually was fact... more than a century ago! What I would like you to tell is if it would sound sort of weird to hear someone say today in the US that a child "creeps" before walking and running (see Synonyms ) rather than it crawls. Also, what's the story to those terms? How did "to crawl" come to prevail and supersede "to creep" to describe the way a baby moves around? As with a plant, so with a child. His mind grows by natural stages. A child creeps before he walks , sits before he stands, cries before he laughs, babbles before he talks, draws a circle before he draws a square, lies before he tells the truth, and is selfish before he
Read more

commas - Does this sentence have too many subjunctives?

Does this sentence have too many subjunctives? If it please the king, let it be decreed that they be destroyed, and I will pay 10,000 talents of silver into the hands of those who have charge of the king's business, that they may put it into the king's treasuries. I am stumped by this sentence construction. First, there is "Let it be," which is a common English idiomatic phrase, but then it follows another subjunctive. Is that to say you can actually have a subjunctive followed by another subjunctive? Also, why does the sentence use "please"? If that's the subjunctive tense there, then why is it followed by another subjunctive instead of a conditional, or maybe "Let it be" is the conditional? Lastly, I wish to know how the that is used in the sentence. Perhaps, the simplified sentence can be restated like so: Let it be decreed that they be destroyed and that they may put it into the king's treasuries. If not, maybe the simplified sent
Read more

grammatical number - Use of lone apostrophe for plural?

I've been reading William Manchester's book "American Caesar", which is about Douglas MacArthur, and I found that he uses a strange convention for pluralizing the family name. When talking about the MacArthurs as a whole, he writes MacArthur' with an apostrophe, as in "After the war, the MacArthur' lived in Tokyo while the general was proconsul" (yes, he uses that term to describe him). I have never seen or heard of a rule that would prescribe this. Manchester is a bit old-timey in his style: for example, he also writes "in behalf of" instead of "on behalf of", which is the only one I have ever seen. So perhaps this is similar. Where does he get this apostrophe from? Edit: There seems to be some difficulty finding examples, which is odd. Here is a direct link to a page from Google Books that shows the apostrophe.
Read more

etymology - Where does the phrase "doctored" originate?

This is a phrase I’m particularly confused about, because it’s used often when something is manipulated or changed. For example, sometimes images surface online that are clearly Photoshopped, but people refer to them as “doctored” images. Why use the word “doctored” here? Answer The earliest Google Books match for an instance of doctored in a transitional (or perhaps post-transitional) sense between "amended" and "adulterated" appears in William Marshall, The Rural Economy of Glocestershire; Including Its Dairy: Together with the Dairy Management of North Wiltshire, and the Management of Orchards and Fruit Liquor, in Herefordshire , volume 2 (1789): Men in general, however, whose palates are set to rough cider, consider the common sweet sort as an effeminate beverage; and rough cider, properly manufactured, is probably the most generous liquor; being deemed more wholesome, to habits in general, than sweet cider:—even when genuine. That which is drank, in the kingd
Read more

phrases - Somebody is gonna kiss the donkey

I heard this phrase when I was watching Battleship. An old man said, "Somebody is gonna kiss the donkey." I do not know what it means, I only heard it in a movie. What is this phrase mean? In Addition: I think it was Rihanna who said "Saddle Ridge will be in weapons range in five minutes," then the old man stated the phrase. Answer It is a confused attempt at a play on (for example) "kiss my ass," or, some similar phrase. It is quite common in English today that idioms get mangled.
Read more

typography - When a dagger is used to indicate a note, must it come after an asterisk?

The typographical symbol dagger (†) has several meanings. Possibly its most common use is as a footnote marker. According to You Have a Point There: A Guide to Punctuation and Its Allies ( Partridge , 1953), when it is used for this purpose, it must be used for second footnotes only; the first footnote should be indicated by an asterisk (*), the third a double dagger (‡) and further footnotes other symbols or numbers. Where does Patridge's rule fall on a scale of one to ten, where one is "this is just one guy's random opinion" and ten is "this is a widely accepted rule of English and any deviation from it is unarguably incorrect"? This question was inspired by this Meta Stack Overflow question about the use of daggers on Stack Exchange site FAQ pages . Answer The dagger (also known as an obelisk ) is properly used for the second footnote. The asterisk is for the first, and the double dagger is for the third. This is supported by several websites: And so
Read more

etymology - Origin of "s--t eating grin"

What is the origin of the phrase shit eating grin ? How did it come to mean showing smugness or self-satisfaction of an individual's actions? Answer From the Urban Dictionary: ...these uses are documented in the Oxford English Dictionary no earlier than 1957 There have been similar expressions used quite far back: In Book XXI of his History of Rome, Livy describes a Carthaginian sect of coprophages, the risus faecivorus, or shit-eating grin, being commonly displayed by its adherents. Although, its origin is undetermined, they may have been incidents which caused the invention of this phrase. Below is an excerpt: "1944 Jrnl. Nerv. & Mental Dis. XCIX. 959 Among demented patients in advanced stages of their illness,..it is not rare to see some of them grasp their own feces, chew them and eat them often with great pleasure and satisfaction (coprophagia).
Read more