grammaticality - “All you have to do is read” vs. “All you have to do is to read”


I was speaking to an English learner and said, “All you have to do is read a lot.” And they thought that sentence wasn’t grammatically correct because I dropped the word to between is and read.


They thought it should be “All you have to do is to read a lot.” That sounds weird to me.


How do I explain to them the reason you drop the to? Or am I incorrect and it really should have a to?




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

etymology - Origin of "s--t eating grin"

First floor vs ground floor, usage origin

usage - "there doesn't seem" vs. "there don't seem"

pronunciation - Where does the intrusive R come from in “warsh”?

Abbreviation of "Street"

etymology - Since when has "a hot minute" meant a long time?

meaning - What is synonyme of "scale"?